About Me

Tuesday, May 17, 2011


Must see.


Climate models are acknowledged by the "climate science" community to be flawed.  Moreover, they themselves  are not valid 'science' in that they do not close the loop: they are hypotheses that must  be validated by observed data.


From AT:
As government elites gain greater money and power from exploiting our ignorance, they posture again about taxpayers and pump prices.  But they really don't care about taxpayers and pump prices at all.  Nothing in their behavior over energy policy leads to that conclusion.  Rather than sticking up for taxpayers and consumers, the biggest pigs at the trough are looking for another way to stick it to taxpayers and consumers.  In classic Atlas Shrugged fashion, the know-nothings mooching off the productivity and ingenuity of capitalists take the public stage to throw sand in the gears of a vital American output engine.  The gouging continues.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011


True? Dunno.  Fascinating.  You bet!
In my initial communication to you of these events I described what unfolded as a temporary Coup initiated by high ranking intelligence and military officials. I stand by that term.  These figures worked around the uncertainty of President Obama and the repeated resistance of Valerie Jarrett.  If they had not been willing to do so, I am certain Osama Bin Laden would still be alive today.

Can I Stop Laughing Long Enough?

Wind power not environmentally "free".

The money quote:
 Furthermore, we show with the general circulation model simulations that some climatic effects at maximum wind power extraction are similar in magnitude to those associated with a doubling of atmospheric CO2.
So, are the GCM's wrong?  That's not what the AGW shills have been telling us for years.